{
"id": "conv_20251008_012515_000",
"title": "请你搜索kimi2,deepseekv3.1,qwen2.5max,claude4.5sonnet,...",
"created_at": "2025-10-08T01:25:16.000064",
"updated_at": "2025-10-08T17:31:03.859265",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "请你搜索kimi2,deepseekv3.1,qwen2.5max,claude4.5sonnet,gemini2.5pro,chatgpt5的性能数据和价格，优势，只做一个网页，使用精美有设计感的页面，包括文字，动态图表，可互动的动画等内容，有明暗切换效果，配色和谐优雅\n注意，创建和编辑大文件时要分多次添加内容\n",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:18.159744"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "我来为您创建一个精美的AI模型性能对比网页。首先让我搜索这些AI模型的最新性能数据和价格信息。",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:20.808945"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:20.811024",
"tool_calls": [
{
"id": "web_search:0",
"index": 0,
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "web_search",
"arguments": "{\"query\": \"kimi 2.0 AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\", \"max_results\": 5}"
}
}
]
},
{
"role": "tool",
"content": "{\"success\": true, \"summary\": \"🔍 搜索查询: kimi 2.0 AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\\n📅 搜索时间: 2025-10-08T01:25:24.940172\\n\\n📝 AI摘要:\\nKimi K2 AI model shows strong performance benchmarks and competitive pricing in 2024, with notable efficiency and cost savings compared to other leading models.\\n\\n---\\n\\n📊 搜索结果:\\n\\n1. Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence - Moonshot\\n 🔗 https://moonshotai.github.io/Kimi-K2/\\n 📄 | AceBench | Acc | 76.5 | 72.7 | 70.5 | 76.2 | 75.6 | 80.1 | 74.5 |\\n| Math & STEM Tasks |\\n| AIME 2024 | Avg@64 | 69.6 | 59.4 | 40.1 | 43.4 | 48.2 | 46.5 | 61.3 |\\n| AIME 2025 | Avg@64 | 49.5 | 46.7 | 2...\\n\\n2. Kimi AI Review 2025: 2 Million Character Context + Free Access ...\\n 🔗 https://www.cursor-ide.com/blog/kimi-ai-review-2025\\n 📄 March 2023: Company founded with 20 employees\\n October 2023: Kimi launches with 200K character context\\n March 2024: Context expanded to 2 million characters\\n November 2024: Reaches 100 million users\\n ...\\n\\n3. Kimi K2 is the large language model series developed by Moonshot ...\\n 🔗 https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-K2\\n 📄 | AIME 2024 | Avg@64 | 69.6 | 59.4 | 40.1 | 43.4 | 48.2 | 46.5 | 61.3 |\\n| AIME 2025 | Avg@64 | 49.5 | 46.7 | 24.7 | 33.1 | 33.9 | 37.0 | 46.6 |\\n| MATH-500 | Acc | 97.4 | 94.0 | 91.2 | 94.0 | 94.4 | 92...\\n\\n4. Kimi-k2 Benchmarks explained - Medium\\n 🔗 https://medium.com/data-science-in-your-pocket/kimi-k2-benchmarks-explained-5b25dd6d3a3e\\n 📄 AIME 2024 (Avg@64): Measures average model performance on 64 high-school level math Olympiad problems; evaluates multi-step symbolic reasoning.\\n AIME 2025 (Avg@64): Harder follow-up to AIME 2024; Avg@...\\n\\n5. China's Moonshot AI Releases Trillion Parameter Model Kimi K2\\n 🔗 https://www.hpcwire.com/2025/07/16/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-trillion-parameter-model-kimi-k2/\\n 📄 Image 10This efficiency translates to big savings: Kimi K2’s pay-as-you-go pricing is about $0.15 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens, sitting well below most frontier models....\"}",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:24.951601",
"tool_call_id": "web_search:0",
"name": "web_search"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:27.233024",
"tool_calls": [
{
"id": "web_search:1",
"index": 0,
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "web_search",
"arguments": "{\"max_results\": 5, \"query\": \"deepseek v3.1 AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\"}"
}
}
]
},
{
"role": "tool",
"content": "{\"success\": true, \"summary\": \"🔍 搜索查询: deepseek v3.1 AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\\n📅 搜索时间: 2025-10-08T01:25:32.631961\\n\\n📝 AI摘要:\\nDeepSeek V3.1 benchmarks show significant improvements over previous versions. DeepSeek pricing is $0.07/1M input tokens, $0.56/1M cache miss input tokens, $1.68/1M output tokens. Off-peak discounts were discontinued on September 5, 2025.\\n\\n---\\n\\n📊 搜索结果:\\n\\n1. DeepSeek-V3.1: Feature,architecture and benchmarks - CometAPI\\n 🔗 https://www.cometapi.com/what-is-deepseek-v3-1/\\n 📄 | Benchmark (metric) | V3.1-NonThinking | V3 (0324) | V3.1-Thinking | R1-0528 |\\n --- --- \\n| AIME 2024 (Pass@1) | 66.3 | 59.4 | 93.1 | 91.4 |\\n| AIME 2025 (Pass@1) | 49.8 | 51.3 | 88.4 | 87.5 |\\n| HMMT ...\\n\\n2. deepseek-v3.1 Model by Deepseek-ai - NVIDIA NIM APIs\\n 🔗 https://build.nvidia.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-v3_1/modelcard\\n 📄 | | Terminal-bench (Terminus 1 framework) | 31.3 | 13.3 5.7 |\\n| Math | | | | | |\\n| | AIME 2024 (Pass@1) | 66.3 | 59.4 | 93.1 | 91.4 |\\n| | AIME 2025 (Pass@1) | 49.8 | 51.3 | 88.4 | 87.5 |\\n| |...\\n\\n3. deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.1 - Hugging Face\\n 🔗 https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.1\\n 📄 | | Terminal-bench (Terminus 1 framework) | 31.3 | 13.3 5.7 |\\n| Math | | | | | |\\n| | AIME 2024 (Pass@1) | 66.3 | 59.4 | 93.1 | 91.4 |\\n| | AIME 2025 (Pass@1) | 49.8 | 51.3 | 88.4 | 87.5 |\\n| |...\\n\\n4. DeepSeek V3 (Dec) - Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis\\n 🔗 https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v3\\n 📄 Analysis of DeepSeek's DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more...\\n\\n5. DeepSeek Pricing: Models, How It Works, And Saving Tips\\n 🔗 https://www.cloudzero.com/blog/deepseek-pricing/\\n 📄 DeepSeek’s architecture leans heavily on Mixture of Experts (MoE) technology. This approach routes only part of the model for each query. And this often means faster inference speeds, lower compute co...\"}",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:32.639567",
"tool_call_id": "web_search:1",
"name": "web_search"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:34.732127",
"tool_calls": [
{
"id": "web_search:2",
"index": 0,
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "web_search",
"arguments": "{\"max_results\": 5, \"query\": \"qwen 2.5 max AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\"}"
}
}
]
},
{
"role": "tool",
"content": "{\"success\": true, \"summary\": \"🔍 搜索查询: qwen 2.5 max AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\\n📅 搜索时间: 2025-10-08T01:25:39.507723\\n\\n📝 AI摘要:\\nQwen 2.5 Max is a top-performing AI model by Alibaba, surpassing others in benchmarks. It costs $0.00041 per 1,000 tokens. The model is available on Alibaba Cloud.\\n\\n---\\n\\n📊 搜索结果:\\n\\n1. Qwen\\n 🔗 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwen\\n 📄 The Qwen-VL series is a line of visual language models that combines a vision transformer with a LLM. Alibaba released Qwen2-VL with variants of 2 billion and 7 billion parameters.\\n\\nIn January 2025, Q...\\n\\n2. Qwen 2.5 vs DeepSeek vs ChatGPT\\n 🔗 https://www.livemint.com/ai/artificial-intelligence/qwen-2-5-vs-deepseek-vs-chatgpt-comparing-performance-efficiency-and-cost-openai-alibaba-ai-battle-11738169175886.html\\n 📄 ## DeepSeek: The cheaper alternative\\n\\nDeepSeek has taken the AI world by storm. Their latest model, DeepSeek-V3, and its newer iteration, the R1 model, have proven to be formidable challengers to esta...\\n\\n3. Qwen 2.5 Max: AI Model outperforms Deepseek V3\\n 🔗 https://medium.com/@samarrana407/qwen-2-5-max-open-source-ai-model-outperforms-deepseek-v3-20cffff7492c\\n 📄 ### Converting PDFs and scanned documents into usable text for Large Language Models (LLMs) is a major hurdle for developers and researchers…\\n\\nApr 15\\n\\n440\\n\\n4\\n\\nSamar Singh\\n\\n## Mastering RAG: Advanced M...\\n\\n4. Alibaba's AI model Qwen 2.5 Max emerges victorious over ...\\n 🔗 https://www.notebookcheck.net/Alibaba-s-AI-model-Qwen-2-5-Max-emerges-victorious-over-Deepseek.954359.0.html\\n 📄 According to Alibaba, Qwen 2.5 Max surpasses leading AI models from Deepseek, OpenAI, and Meta in performance assessments. The model demonstrated superior results across various benchmarks, including ...\\n\\n5. Models and pricing\\n 🔗 https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/models\\n 📄 | Corresponds to the latest snapshot. | | $1.6 | $6.4 |\\n| Also known as qwen-max-0125, Qwen2.5-Max | Snapshot | [...] | qwen-turbo-latest Provides the same capabilities as the latest snapshot. Part...\"}",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:39.511988",
"tool_call_id": "web_search:2",
"name": "web_search"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:41.258525",
"tool_calls": [
{
"id": "web_search:3",
"index": 0,
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "web_search",
"arguments": "{\"max_results\": 5, \"query\": \"claude 4.5 sonnet AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\"}"
}
}
]
},
{
"role": "tool",
"content": "{\"success\": true, \"summary\": \"🔍 搜索查询: claude 4.5 sonnet AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\\n📅 搜索时间: 2025-10-08T01:25:45.759640\\n\\n📝 AI摘要:\\nIn 2024, Claude Sonnet 4.5's performance benchmarks improved significantly, and its pricing remains at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens.\\n\\n---\\n\\n📊 搜索结果:\\n\\n1. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pricing Guide 2025: Complete Cost Analysis ...\\n 🔗 https://www.cursor-ide.com/blog/claude-sonnet-4-5-pricing\\n 📄 ### Pricing History and Anthropic's Strategy\\n\\nAnthropic has demonstrated remarkable pricing consistency across its Sonnet model releases. Claude Sonnet 3.5, launched in October 2024, established the $...\\n\\n2. Claude 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 (2025): Should You Upgrade Now?\\n 🔗 https://skywork.ai/blog/claude-4-5-vs-claude-3-5-2025-comparison/\\n 📄 Notes:\\n\\n Pricing parity: Anthropic reiterated that Sonnet 4.5 keeps Sonnet-tier pricing at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens in 2025 (see the Anthropic 4.5 announcement, 20...\\n\\n3. Claude Sonnet 4.5: Tests, Features, Access, Benchmarks, and More\\n 🔗 https://www.datacamp.com/blog/claude-sonnet-4-5\\n 📄 You can use Claude Sonnet 4.5 directly through the Claude.ai web interface or mobile apps (iOS and Android). It’s available to all users, including those on the free tier. This makes it widely accessi...\\n\\n4. Upgrading to Claude 4.5: Key Benefits Over Previous Versions (2025)\\n 🔗 https://skywork.ai/blog/claude-4-5-vs-claude-4-3-2-2025-comparison/\\n 📄 | Model | Coding/Agentic Highlights | Safety (ASL) | Context Window | Pricing (API) |\\n --- --- \\n| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | SWE‑Bench Verified ~77.2%; OSWorld ~61.4%; long‑horizon >30 hrs | ASL‑3 | 200K to...\\n\\n5. Introducing Claude Sonnet 4.5 - Anthropic\\n 🔗 https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-4-5\\n 📄 This is the most aligned frontier model we’ve ever released, showing large improvements across several areas of alignment compared to previous Claude models.\\n\\nClaude Sonnet 4.5 is available everywhere...\"}",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:45.768489",
"tool_call_id": "web_search:3",
"name": "web_search"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:48.031547",
"tool_calls": [
{
"id": "web_search:4",
"index": 0,
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "web_search",
"arguments": "{\"max_results\": 5, \"query\": \"gemini 2.5 pro AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\"}"
}
}
]
},
{
"role": "tool",
"content": "{\"success\": true, \"summary\": \"🔍 搜索查询: gemini 2.5 pro AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\\n📅 搜索时间: 2025-10-08T01:25:52.012889\\n\\n📝 AI摘要:\\nGemini 2.5 Pro benchmarks show strong performance in reasoning, math, and coding. It costs $2.50 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens. Pricing is competitive compared to other models.\\n\\n---\\n\\n📊 搜索结果:\\n\\n1. Gemini 2.5 Pro: Features, Tests, Access, Benchmarks & More\\n 🔗 https://www.datacamp.com/blog/gemini-2-5-pro\\n 📄 | | | | |\\n --- --- |\\n| Category | Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Closest Competitors |\\n| Reasoning & General Knowledge | Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) | 18.8% | o3-mini (14%), Claude 3.7 (8.9%), ...\\n\\n2. Gemini 2.5 Cost and Quality Comparison | Pricing & Performance\\n 🔗 https://www.leanware.co/insights/gemini-2-5-cost-quality-comparison\\n 📄 Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.5 Pro is Google DeepMind’s latest multimodal model, released on March 25, 2025, as an experimental upgrade. Built on the Gemini 1.5 architecture, it features stronger reasoning,...\\n\\n3. Gemini AI Pricing: What You'll Really Pay In 2025 - CloudZero\\n 🔗 https://www.cloudzero.com/blog/gemini-pricing/\\n 📄 | | | |\\n --- \\n| AI Model | Pricing Details | Notes |\\n| Gemini 2.5 Pro (API) | ≤200K tokens — Input: $1.25/M tokens, Output: $10/M tokens. >200K tokens — Input: $2.50/M, Output: $15/M. Context cachi...\\n\\n4. Gemini 2.5 Pro: A Comparative Analysis Against Its AI Rivals (2025 ...\\n 🔗 https://dirox.com/post/gemini-2-5-pro-a-comparative-analysis-against-its-ai-rivals-2025-landscape\\n 📄 > Humanity's Last Exam (HLE):Achieves 18.8%accuracy without tool use. This benchmark testsexpert-level knowledge and reasoningacross diverse fields.Gemini 2.5 Pro's score significantly leads competito...\\n\\n5. Gemini 2.5 Pro - Google DeepMind\\n 🔗 https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/\\n 📄 | Benchmark | | Gemini 2.5 Pro Thinking | OpenAI o3 High | OpenAI o4-mini High | Claude Opus 4 32k thinking | Grok 3 Beta Extended thinking | DeepSeek R1 05-28 |\\n --- --- --- --- |\\n| Input price |...\"}",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:52.019977",
"tool_call_id": "web_search:4",
"name": "web_search"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:53.776858",
"tool_calls": [
{
"id": "web_search:5",
"index": 0,
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "web_search",
"arguments": "{\"max_results\": 5, \"query\": \"chatgpt 5 gpt-5 AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\"}"
}
}
]
},
{
"role": "tool",
"content": "{\"success\": true, \"summary\": \"🔍 搜索查询: chatgpt 5 gpt-5 AI model performance benchmarks pricing 2024\\n📅 搜索时间: 2025-10-08T01:25:58.045680\\n\\n📝 AI摘要:\\nGPT-5 offers superior performance benchmarks and is competitively priced at $1.25/million input tokens and $10/million output tokens. It's available in various tiers, with the most advanced version at $200/month. The model excels in coding and complex tasks.\\n\\n---\\n\\n📊 搜索结果:\\n\\n1. GPT-5 vs o3 vs 4o vs GPT-5 Pro — 2025 Benchmarks & Best Uses\\n 🔗 https://www.getpassionfruit.com/blog/chatgpt-5-vs-gpt-5-pro-vs-gpt-4o-vs-o3-performance-benchmark-comparison-recommendation-of-openai-s-2025-models\\n 📄 Feature / MetricGPT-4 / GPT-4o (ChatGPT-4)GPT-5 (ChatGPT-5)Key Improvement\\nRelease DateGPT-4o: May 2024 (GPT-4 earlier in 2023)August 7, 2025 Latest flagship release with unified architecture\\nModel Ar...\\n\\n2. Measuring the performance of our models on real-world tasks | OpenAI\\n 🔗 https://openai.com/index/gdpval/\\n 📄 experts, as shown in the bar chart below. Claude Opus 4.1 was the best performing model in the set, excelling in particular on aesthetics (e.g., document formatting, slide layout), and GPT‑5 excelled ...\\n\\n3. GPT-5 Benchmarks - Vellum AI\\n 🔗 https://www.vellum.ai/blog/gpt-5-benchmarks\\n 📄 GPT-5 is finally here! It comes with 400k context window, and 128k output window. That’s a nice upgrade, given that the price is on the lower end $1.25/$10 for input/output tokens.\\n\\nIt’s available in ...\\n\\n4. GPT-5: Key characteristics, pricing and model card\\n 🔗 https://simonwillison.net/2025/Aug/7/gpt-5/\\n 📄 | Previous model | GPT-5 model |\\n --- |\\n| GPT-4o | gpt-5-main |\\n| GPT-4o-mini | gpt-5-main-mini |\\n| OpenAI o3 | gpt-5-thinking |\\n| OpenAI o4-mini | gpt-5-thinking-mini |\\n| GPT-4.1-nano | gpt-5-thinkin...\\n\\n5. API Pricing - OpenAI\\n 🔗 https://openai.com/api/pricing/\\n 📄 Our frontier models designed to spend more time thinking before producing a response, making them ideal for complex, multi-step problems.\\n\\nGPT-5\\n\\nThe best model for coding and agentic tasks across ind...\"}",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:58.054690",
"tool_call_id": "web_search:5",
"name": "web_search"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "现在让我创建项目文件夹和主要的HTML文件：",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:59.900338"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:25:59.908291",
"tool_calls": [
{
"id": "create_folder:6",
"index": 0,
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "create_folder",
"arguments": "{\"path\": \"ai_models_comparison\"}"
}
}
]
},
{
"role": "tool",
"content": "{\"success\": true, \"path\": \"ai_models_comparison\"}",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:26:01.736043",
"tool_call_id": "create_folder:6",
"name": "create_folder"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "n",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:27:30.960356"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:27:30.965408",
"tool_calls": [
{
"id": "create_file:7",
"index": 0,
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "create_file",
"arguments": "{\"path\": \"ai_models_comparison/index.html\", \"file_type\": \"html\", \"annotation\": \"AI模型性能对比主页面\", \"content\": \"\\n\\n\\n \\n \\n AI模型性能对比 - 2024年度评测\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n\\n\\n \\n